Question by PaRtY 2012 -One Down Two to Go: Why is Canada embracing the “Old” US model of “each person pay for their own health-care”?
British Columbia is replacing block grants to hospitals with fee-for-procedure payments and Quebec has a new flat health tax and a proposal for payments on each medical visit — an idea that critics say is an illegal user fee.
And a few provinces are also experimenting with private funding for procedures such as hip, knee and cataract surgery.
Canada, fretting over budget strains, wants to prune its system, while the United States, worrying about an army of uninsured, aims to create a state-backed safety net.
Healthcare in Canada is delivered through a publicly funded system, which covers all “medically necessary” hospital and physician care and curbs the role of private medicine. It ate up about 40 percent of provincial budgets, or some C$ 183 billion ($ 174 billion) last year.
Spending has been rising 6 percent a year under a deal that added C$ 41.3 billion of federal funding over 10 years.
But that deal ends in 2013, and the federal government is unlikely to be as generous in future, especially for one-off projects.
“As Ottawa looks to repair its budget balance … one could see these one-time allocations to specific health projects might be curtailed,” said Mary Webb, senior economist at Scotia Capital.
Brian Golden, a professor at University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Business, said provinces are weighing new sources of funding, including “means-testing” and moving toward evidence-based and pay-for-performance models.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100531/hl_nm/us_health_3
Best answer:
Answer by RockIt
Because it puts responsibility where it belongs. With the individual not the state.
The state model doesn’t work.
What do you think? Answer below!